USPER Statement about UAP Sighting

Page 1 --- SECRET//NOFORN On 2025, at approximately 1700 hoursllll [WITNESS 1 (a senior US inte Igence o Ic1al)], [FEDERAL PARTNER 1] and [F~L PARTNER 2], accompanied by [WITNESS 2 (a senior US in…’ aiBriefing: ”## Document Overview\nThis SECRET//NOFORN document from an unknown agency
\ details a UAP-related search operation conducted on an unspecified date in 2025,
\ involving helicopter sorties and ground-based sensor teams investigating visual
\ and auditory anomalies near a mountain facility. The report describes multiple
\ sightings of orbs and an incident where a “super-hot” object maneuvered rapidly
\ near a helicopter.\n> Source: OCR extracted text, Page 1, lines 1–4 (classification
\ markings) and narrative timeline.\n\n## What This Document Contains\n- A timeline
\ of a daytime aerial search for reported orbs/lights, followed by a night-time
\ intercept of an unidentified object using Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) and
\ Night Vision Goggles (NVG).\n- Witness reports of “thuds as if something fallen
\ and hit the ground” correlated with orb/light sightings in the area.\n- Sensor
\ data from a Listening Post/Observation Post (LP/OP) describing an orb as “super-hot”
\ that split into two objects and came within 10 feet of the helicopter.\n> Source:
\ OCR Page 1 and Page 2; metadata classification field.\n\n## Key Observations\n\

• “personnel who observed orbs/lights … cited hearing thuds as if something fallen
  \ and hit the ground.” \n> Source: OCR Page 1, paragraph describing initial witness
  \ reports.\n- “LP/OP confirmed the sighting then relayed they spotted an orb under
  \ FUR and described as ‘super-hot’ hovering at ground level before heading bearing
  \ … reported the orb was heading east and then south at a high rate of speed and
  \ then broke into two objects.” \n> Source: OCR Page 1, paragraph starting “At
  \ 2202 hours”.\n- “LP/OP reported the orb gained elevation, came within ten feet
  \ of [CALL SIGN 1] and then headed east” \n> Source: OCR Page 2, final paragraph.\n
  \n## Context & Significance\nThe operation likely involved multiple U.S. intelligence
  \ and military elements, a federal partner, and a state partner organization, as
  \ indicated by the redacted roles. The presence of a “successful test” at the facility
  \ earlier that day suggests the site may be a research or test range, though any
  \ connection to the UAP sightings is not stated. The document contributes to the
  \ historical record of military encounters with unidentified objects exhibiting
  \ advanced flight characteristics, documented by multiple sensor systems.\n> Source:
  \ OCR Page 1 (note about test, personnel roles); Page 2 (helicopter and LP/OP coordination).\n
  \n## Evidence Assessment\nWhat this document shows:\n- A coordinated military
  \ response to real-time UAP observations, including eyewitness reports, acoustic
  \ anomalies, and FLIR/NVG tracking.\n- The orb exhibited unusual performance: hovering,
  \ high speed, splitting into multiple objects, and close approach to an aircraft.\n
  \nWhat this document does NOT show:\n- No confirmation of extraterrestrial origin
  \ or technology.\n- No definitive identification of the observed phenomena.\n- Independent
  \ analysis should refer to original document.\n\nAssessment: The document provides
  \ multi-sensor (visual, FLIR, auditory) and multi-witness evidence of an object
  \ with anomalous flight behavior. However, all technical details and participants
  \ are heavily redacted, limiting independent verification and preventing assessment
  \ of sensor calibration or environmental conditions. The coincidence with a test
  \ at the same facility warrants caution in interpreting the observations.\n> Source:
  \ OCR text analysis; assessment based on available content and redaction constraints.” keyFindings: [] tags:
• DOW
• Investigation
• N/A relatedFiles: [] featured: false heroImage: /pdf-covers/usper-statement-about-uap-sighting.png documentType: Investigation region: N/A decade: N/A releaseBatch: Release 01 coverImage: /pdf-covers/usper-statement-about-uap-sighting.png archiveId: USPER_Statement_about_UAP_Sighting warGovUrl: https://www.war.gov/ufo/#usper statement about uap sighting officialDescription: ’--- Page 1 --- SECRET//NOFORN On 2025, at approximately 1700 hoursllll [WITNESS 1 (a senior US inte Igence o Ic1al)], [FEDERAL PARTNER 1] and [FL PARTNER 2], accompanied by [WITNESS 2 (a senior US intelligence official ilots from [STATE PARTNER ORGANIZATION], departed th [OPERATIONS CENTER] ([COORDINATES]), main area via a [STATE PARTNE e Icop er (call sign [CALL SIGN 11) to conduct a daytime ariel search of the [MOUNTAIN RANGE NAME] west of [SITE CODE NAME] on [FACIUyewitness reports from personnel who observed orbs/lights IV~[COORDINATES]) cited hearing thuds as if someth~ fallen and hit the ground. (Note: Earlier that day the ffice-completed a successful test of the at [SITE CODE NAME] ([COORDINATES]) on [FACILITY]. At 1751 hours [CALL SIGN 1] spotted-lar e cavern entrance ([COORDINATES]) and conducted a short orbit of the location At a roximately 2050 hours-[CALL SIGN 1] landed wes’ evidenceLevel: Historical Record hasUAPObservation: true mentionsPhysicalEvidence: true mentionsBiological: false ocrQuality: high

[WARN] AI-Generated Summary: This summary is generated from publicly released government documents for informational purposes only. Always refer to the original document linked below for the complete unredacted record.

Document Overview

This SECRET//NOFORN document from an unknown agency details a UAP-related search operation conducted on an unspecified date in 2025, involving helicopter sorties and ground-based sensor teams investigating visual and auditory anomalies near a mountain facility. The report describes multiple sightings of orbs and an incident where a “super-hot” object maneuvered rapidly near a helicopter.

Source: OCR extracted text, Page 1, lines 1–4 (classification markings) and narrative timeline.

What This Document Contains

• A timeline of a daytime aerial search for reported orbs/lights, followed by a night-time intercept of an unidentified object using Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) and Night Vision Goggles (NVG).
• Witness reports of “thuds as if something fallen and hit the ground” correlated with orb/light sightings in the area.
• Sensor data from a Listening Post/Observation Post (LP/OP) describing an orb as “super-hot” that split into two objects and came within 10 feet of the helicopter.

Source: OCR Page 1 and Page 2; metadata classification field.

Key Observations

• “personnel who observed orbs/lights … cited hearing thuds as if something fallen and hit the ground.”

Source: OCR Page 1, paragraph describing initial witness reports.

• “LP/OP confirmed the sighting then relayed they spotted an orb under FUR and described as ‘super-hot’ hovering at ground level before heading bearing … reported the orb was heading east and then south at a high rate of speed and then broke into two objects.”

Source: OCR Page 1, paragraph starting “At 2202 hours”.

• “LP/OP reported the orb gained elevation, came within ten feet of [CALL SIGN 1] and then headed east”

Source: OCR Page 2, final paragraph.

Context & Significance

The operation likely involved multiple U.S. intelligence and military elements, a federal partner, and a state partner organization, as indicated by the redacted roles. The presence of a “successful test” at the facility earlier that day suggests the site may be a research or test range, though any connection to the UAP sightings is not stated. The document contributes to the historical record of military encounters with unidentified objects exhibiting advanced flight characteristics, documented by multiple sensor systems.

Source: OCR Page 1 (note about test, personnel roles); Page 2 (helicopter and LP/OP coordination).

Evidence Assessment

What this document shows:

• A coordinated military response to real-time UAP observations, including eyewitness reports, acoustic anomalies, and FLIR/NVG tracking.
• The orb exhibited unusual performance: hovering, high speed, splitting into multiple objects, and close approach to an aircraft.

What this document does NOT show:

• No confirmation of extraterrestrial origin or technology.
• No definitive identification of the observed phenomena.
• Independent analysis should refer to original document.

Assessment: The document provides multi-sensor (visual, FLIR, auditory) and multi-witness evidence of an object with anomalous flight behavior. However, all technical details and participants are heavily redacted, limiting independent verification and preventing assessment of sensor calibration or environmental conditions. The coincidence with a test at the same facility warrants caution in interpreting the observations.

Source: OCR text analysis; assessment based on available content and redaction constraints.