Unresolved UAP Video Evidence

UAP Video Evidence Collection

This collection contains video evidence of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena captured by U.S. military platforms using advanced sensor systems. The footage was recorded across multiple theaters of operation and submitted to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) for analysis. These 49 video files represent the most comprehensive release of military UAP footage to date, spanning operations from 2013 to 2026.

The videos were captured during routine military operations, training exercises, and intelligence collection missions. In every case, the objects observed could not be definitively identified by aircrew, sensor operators, or subsequent technical analysis. AARO’s assessments, included with each file, explicitly classify these as “unresolved”—meaning no conventional explanation (aircraft, drone, balloon, natural phenomenon, or sensor artifact) could be confirmed.

Sensor Types and Technical Specifications

The video evidence includes footage from multiple sensor systems, each providing different observational capabilities:

Infrared (IR) Sensors

Infrared footage constitutes approximately 60% of the collection. These thermal imaging systems detect heat signatures rather than visible light, making them particularly effective for identifying objects against cold sky backgrounds or during nighttime operations. The IR footage reveals objects that emit little to no thermal signature, or in some cases, exhibit anomalous thermal characteristics inconsistent with conventional propulsion systems.

Key technical observations from IR analysis:

• Objects appear as dark or cold spots against warmer atmospheric backgrounds, suggesting minimal heat generation
• Some objects show no detectable exhaust plume despite apparent propulsion
• Thermal profiles do not match known aircraft signatures (jet engines produce distinct thermal blooms)
• Objects maintain consistent thermal signatures during extreme maneuvers that would stress conventional airframes

Electro-Optical (EO) Cameras

Visual spectrum recordings provide the most intuitive evidence but are also subject to the most interpretation challenges. EO footage in this collection was captured using high-resolution military cameras with stabilized mounts and digital zoom capabilities.

The EO videos document objects that:

• Lack visible control surfaces, wings, or conventional aerodynamic features
• Appear as geometric shapes (spheres, discs, cylinders, or amorphous forms)
• Change shape or orientation during flight in ways inconsistent with rigid aircraft structures
• Reflect light in unusual patterns, sometimes appearing translucent or metallic

Full Motion Video (FMV) Systems

FMV platforms provide continuous, uninterrupted recording with integrated metadata (GPS coordinates, altitude, heading, timestamp). The FMV footage in this collection includes:

• Persistent tracking data showing object trajectories over extended periods
• Ground reference points that enable velocity and acceleration calculations
• Multi-angle perspectives when multiple platforms observe the same object
• Synchronized audio recording of aircrew commentary and radio communications

Multi-Sensor Correlation

Several incidents in the collection feature simultaneous recording from multiple sensor types observing the same object. These multi-sensor correlations are particularly significant because they:

• Rule out single-sensor artifacts or malfunctions
• Provide independent confirmation of object characteristics
• Enable cross-validation of measurements (size, speed, altitude)
• Document object behavior across different wavelengths and detection modalities

Geographic and Temporal Distribution

Middle East (USCENTCOM)

The largest concentration of videos—32 files—originates from U.S. Central Command operations. The Middle East theater provides unique observational advantages:

• Clear atmospheric conditions: Desert environments offer exceptional visibility and minimal weather interference
• Extensive air operations: High volume of military flights increases encounter probability
• Advanced sensor deployment: CENTCOM operates cutting-edge ISR platforms with multi-sensor capabilities
• Training areas: Large, restricted airspace allows for unimpeded observation without civilian air traffic

Notable Middle East incidents include:

PR36–PR42 (May 2020): A series of seven videos documenting sustained encounters during Arabian Gulf operations. Multiple objects tracked for over 90 minutes, exhibiting coordinated movement patterns. The objects maintained formation while executing maneuvers that AARO analysts described as “inconsistent with known drone swarm technology.”

PR19–PR23 (2022): Encounters during operations in Iraq, Syria, and Kuwait. These videos show objects approaching U.S. military positions at close range—sometimes within weapons engagement envelopes—before executing rapid accelerations away from the area.

PR26–PR27 (October 2023): Footage from United Arab Emirates airspace showing objects tracked by both ground-based radar and airborne sensors. The multi-platform correlation enabled precise trajectory calculations showing sustained hypersonic velocities without visible propulsion.

PR29 (June 2024): Perhaps the most analyzed video in the collection, showing an object that descends from high altitude, hovers motionless for several minutes near a military installation, then accelerates vertically at rates calculated to exceed 5,000 mph. The object’s ability to hover without rotor systems or aerodynamic lift baffled AARO engineers.

Indo-Pacific (INDOPACOM)

Three videos from Indo-Pacific operations (PR46–PR48, 2023–2024) document encounters in maritime environments. These are particularly significant because they show:

• Objects transitioning between air and water (trans-medium capability)
• Subsurface signatures correlated with aerial observations
• Interaction with naval task force operations
• Objects maintaining station near military vessels for extended periods

PR46 (2024) shows an object tracked by a P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft that descends from 30,000 feet, enters the water without splash or disturbance, and continues operating submerged at speeds exceeding known submarine capabilities.

Europe and Mediterranean

Four videos from Greece (PR28, PR34–PR35) and regional operations document encounters during NATO exercises and Mediterranean deployments. These incidents are notable for:

• Multi-national observer confirmation (U.S., Greek, and other NATO forces)
• Integration with allied sensor networks
• Objects observed near sensitive military communications infrastructure
• Correlation with civilian aviation reports filed through official channels

Africa (USAFRICOM)

PR43 (2025) represents the most recent video in the collection, captured during operations in Africa. This video documents an object observed by multiple crew members of a reconnaissance aircraft, showing characteristics consistent with previously documented incidents but captured with next-generation sensor systems providing higher resolution and frame rates.

NASA Apollo Video Evidence

The collection includes six videos from NASA’s Apollo program (1969–1972), representing the earliest UAP video evidence in the archive:

VM1–VM5 (Apollo 12, 1969): Five video segments from Apollo 12 mission footage showing anomalous objects observed during lunar transit and orbital operations. The objects appear as bright points of light that maintain relative position to the spacecraft while executing independent maneuvers. NASA’s internal assessment (included in companion document files) noted the objects “do not correspond to any known debris, spacecraft component, or natural celestial body.”

VM6 (Apollo 17, 1972): Footage from the final Apollo mission showing an object tracked by the crew during lunar orbit. Commander Eugene Cernan’s audio commentary (transcribed in companion files) describes “something out there that’s not part of our equipment.” The object maintained station relative to the spacecraft for approximately 22 minutes before accelerating away.

Observation Characteristics and Flight Profiles

The videos document objects exhibiting a consistent set of anomalous characteristics across different locations, time periods, and sensor systems:

Extreme Acceleration

Multiple videos show objects accelerating from hover or low speed to velocities exceeding Mach 3+ without visible propulsion or sonic effects. Acceleration profiles show:

• Instantaneous velocity changes without gradual acceleration curves
• No visible compression effects or shock waves
• No thermal signature increase corresponding to high-speed flight
• Maneuvers that would subject conventional occupants to lethal G-forces

Trans-Medium Travel

Several videos document objects operating across air-water boundaries:

• Objects entering water without splash, cavitation, or thermal disturbance
• Submerged operation at speeds exceeding known underwater propulsion
• Transition between aerial and submerged modes without visible mechanism
• Maintaining structural integrity under pressure differentials

Silent Operation

Audio tracks from FMV systems consistently document:

• No detectable engine noise despite close proximity (within 1,000 feet)
• No rotor sounds, jet roar, or propeller noise
• Absence of sonic boom during supersonic acceleration
• Objects operating in acoustic sensor range with no signature

Formation and Coordinated Movement

Multiple incidents show multiple objects operating in coordinated patterns:

• Geometric formations (triangles, diamonds, linear arrays)
• Synchronized maneuvers maintaining relative position
• Distributed swarm behavior with apparent coordinated intent
• Objects merging and separating without collision

Hovering Without Visible Propulsion

Objects demonstrate stationary hovering capabilities without:

• Rotor systems (helicopters, drones)
• Aerodynamic lift (wings, control surfaces)
• Thermal plumes from thrust vectoring
• Visible support structures or tethers

AARO Analysis and Assessment

Each video in the collection includes AARO’s formal assessment. The consistent conclusion across all 49 files is “unresolved”—meaning:

“After technical analysis of sensor data, review of operational context, and evaluation against known aircraft, drone, balloon, and natural phenomenon databases, AARO was unable to determine the nature or origin of the observed objects. The possibility that these represent sensor artifacts, misidentifications, or classified U.S. or foreign technology cannot be definitively excluded, but no specific conventional explanation could be confirmed.”

AARO’s analysis methodology includes:

1. Sensor validation: Verification that the sensor was functioning correctly and the footage has not been altered
2. Flight parameter calculation: Using sensor metadata to calculate speed, altitude, and acceleration
3. Platform correlation: Cross-referencing with other platforms, radar, or visual observers
4. Database comparison: Matching observed characteristics against known aircraft, drones, and balloons
5. Environmental analysis: Evaluating atmospheric conditions, celestial objects, and natural phenomena
6. Operational context review: Assessing whether the observation occurred during known military exercises or tests

Historical Context and Release Significance

The release of this video collection represents a fundamental shift in government transparency regarding UAP evidence. Previous releases, such as the three “GIMBAL,” “GOFAST,” and “FLIR” videos in 2017–2020, were limited in scope and lacked the comprehensive documentation provided here.

The 2026 PURSUE release provides:

• Complete, unedited footage (not selected excerpts)
• Full sensor metadata and operational context
• Formal AARO assessments with methodology disclosure
• Correlation with related mission reports and incident documentation
• Historical context including Apollo-era footage never previously released

Viewing and Analysis Notes

The original video files are hosted on war.gov and DVIDS. This archive provides metadata, context, and links to the official sources for each video.

Researchers should note:

• Video quality varies based on the sensor system and environmental conditions
• Some footage includes aircrew commentary that contains operational information redacted for security
• Frame rates and resolutions differ across sensor types
• Night-vision and IR footage may appear grainy or low-contrast compared to EO video
• Metadata overlays (timestamp, coordinates, altitude) are essential for accurate analysis

This collection represents the most significant release of UAP visual evidence in history and will serve as the primary dataset for scientific analysis, academic research, and public understanding of the phenomenon for years to come.